Euthanasia essay Essay

For several years, euthanasia has been a subject of controversy. euthanasia is a slightly new problem for the United States and has gained a tremendous reputation from negative media publicity surrounding the issue. fit to a website Euthanasia also known as mercy killing is a way of painlessly terminating bingles deportment with the humane motive of ending crucifixion. Euthanasia came into the public eye of late during the Terri Schiavo controversy where her husband appealed for euthanasia while Terris family claimed differently. This is a classical case, shedding light on the pros and cons of mercy killing. (Pros and Cons)Many claim the betrayal of Gods right to control the human animation and state that the legalization of euthanasia is the legalization of murder. However, people that are opposed to euthanasia are cerebration how the death of a terminally ill patient would prompt them, not how it affects the mortal that is sick. If there is no other way to relieve the su ffering of terminally ill patients, then the more humane pickaxe to felo-de-se is euthanasia. Euthanasia has a purpose and should be evaluated as humanely filling a vanity created by our inhumane society. Terminally ill patients already feel that they are deprived of all rights. However, some(prenominal) adversaries are not in favor of a patients right to go past, it may appear heartless to consider the financial burden of keeping a patient alive against the patients go out. Smith states, that the cost of chemotherapy is deemed an unjustified expense for the government to pay due to the limited time it would provide. However, the government informed the terminally ill patient that they will gladly pay for euthanasia (Smith). By the denomination stating this quote, then if a patient has already told family members that they wish to die and discontinue the burden of the patients family members, euthanasia should be permissible. Even criminals have a right for their last wish. A website states, Legalizing euthanasia would religious service alleviate suffering of the terminally ill patients. It would be inhuman and unfair to make them endure the insufferablepain (Pros and Cons). It is the physicians duty to fulfill the last wish of terminally ill patients. If the persons will is rejected, one might try to commit the act of suicide. Euthanasia is often ill-judged or associated with assisted suicide. Doctors now have the technology and the skills to anticipate natural death almost indefinitely. A website oblige states, In an attempt to provide medical and emotional tutorship, a doctor does and should prescribe medicines that will relieve suffering even if the medications cause side effects. Euthanasia follows the same theory of dealing with suffering in a way to help one die peacefully (Pros and Cons). There is a distinctive difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide. Euthanasia is the ability to die with dignity, while assisted suicide is assi sting one to commit suicide. Euthanasia happens when a physician or other healthcare provider does something, some(prenominal)(prenominal) as administering a known lethal dit of a drug with the patients consent.Physician-Assisted suicide is where the terminally ill patients request a prescription for a fatal dose of a drug which they mountain administer to themselves at a time of their choosing. Ernst and Mennie had stated in an article that both euthanasia and assisted suicide force someone else to end your life. The job of the health care sea captain is to maintain and enhance life, not end it (Ernst and Mennie). However, when one thinks of the job of the health care professional it is to add quality and subject matter to ones life. In some situations, when there is a terminally ill patient that will never be able to have quality or meaning in their life wouldnt it be the duty of the physician to suggest euthanasia so one may die with dignity. The first priority in the care of patients facing severe pain as a result of a terminal illness or chronic condition should be the backup of their pain. A website states, Palliative care can control nearly all pain when it cant, doctors can administer palliative care sedation that allows the patient to die a natural death without experiencing horrible symptoms (Erst and Mennie).Many adversaries of euthanasia have feared that the increasing technology that doctors have now might lead to the call out of euthanasia. Most people today support the rights of terminally ill patients to end their pain through euthanasia. A website states, In case of individuals suffering from incurable diseases or in conditions where effective treatment wouldnt affect their quality of life they should be given the liberty tochoose euthanasia (Pros and Cons). This issue has been a ain experience for me after seeing my grandfather at deaths door for over 17 months, waking up in his feces and urine, and begging God to let him die. If eu thanasia was legalized, maybe he would have had the choice to die with dignity. Terminally ill patients should have the right to choose euthanasia.There has been much controversy over euthanasia in the past several years and is likely to remain a controversial subject because of the disapproval from many religious groups and the medical profession. Religious groups as well as the medical profession agree that doctors are not required to use extraordinary measures to prolong the life of the terminally ill. The government should legalize euthanasia because it is important in protecting the structure of the United States. Euthanasia should remain a choice and should be legalized. The right to choose euthanasia should not be limit by others opinions and should be based on the individuals right to die with dignity.