Comparing Poems Essay Example for Free

Comparing Poems EssayIdentity is different for e very(prenominal) person, it is what separates us either and makes us unique. Identity can be split into many categories. In the poem Nothings Changed, segregation is employ to show us the poets tints whereas Half-Caste is mainly foc utilize on racial equality.Each of the poets structure their poems in slip look that express their olfactionings and ideas slightly identity the differences in each vary. Half-Caste consists of 4 stanzas, written with a lack of punctuation and in patois dialect that allows the reader the freedom to express the poem in a right smart that they wish. Also, the haphazard, informal way that the poem is written suggests it should be read aloud.This reflects John Agards strive for freedom. The phrase, Explain yuself/wha yu ungenerous/when yu say half-caste, is a refrain. This refrain is repeated throughout the poem to question the reader. It is an aggressive confrontation surrounded by the reader an d the poet that elicits an answer from the reader. Nothings Changed is written formally so that the poet can express a controlled angriness. Segregation is used to show the separate identities of blacks and whites. It is set out in 7 stanzas. The formal punctuation and structure is very organised which makes the poem seem like a story.Language is used to a dramatic transaction in both poems, it reveals the poets ideas about identity. Firstly, in Half-Caste there is a pun of the half-caste weather, yu mean when light an dark/mix in de sky/is a half-caste weather/, this play on words mocks the phrase half-caste which emphasises the poets feelings about a half-caste identity. In Nothings Changed, throughout the first stanza there is a series of onomatopoeias that give the reader the paradigm of a man walking in a baron place.The biliousness of the poet is very much reflected in the diction of Half-Caste and portrays the image of anger, confusion and annoyance. An example of this l anguage is Ah listening to yu wid de keen/half of mih earwhy I cracking yu half-a-hand. This gives the reader the representation of a ridiculous happening, which is disrespectful to the opposing person. Nothings Changed alike sh ares a similar mood of anger and frustration. The poet writesand the skin about my bones/andthe soft labouring of my lungs,/and the hot, white, inwardsturning/anger of my eyes.This includes in spite of appearance it repetition, powerful, angry words and references to body parts that identify the persons feeling of a painful anger.The poets use language to reveal their feelings about identity in both similar and different ways. They both project anger and confusion about the attitude of to twenty-four hour periods society knowing that equality is not present. In Nothings Changed the poet writesHands lose ones temper/for a stone, a bomb,/to shiver down the glass. /Nothings Changed.This begins with a metaphor Hands burn which shows the person is feeling ang ry.The words a bomb,/to shiver down the glass. Are extremely effective as the glass acts as a symbolic barrier between colours and to shiver down this glass would be to spite the differences/barriers between people of different colours. The poem ends with Nothings Changed, which basically sums the whole theory up there eternally has been and always will be inequality within the world. This is similar to Half-Caste because throughout this poem John Agard is truism that people have no respect for each other and never will. He hopes though by saying but yu must come back tomorrowde other half/of my story that one day the prejudice might be put aside and people will come back with a better attitude towards each other.The identities that both poets show to reveal their feelings are similar because they both feel as though they have been victimized. The similarity is that in Half-Caste the man emphasises his thoughts by expanding things out of proportion to demo a vertex Ah listening to yu wid de keen/half of mih earwhy I offer yu half-a-hand, and in Nothings Changed the person also takes things and changes them into something worse. An example of this is when it says whites still inn/No sign says it is/but we know where we belong. This is saying that the restaurant is only for rich, white people even though he knows there isnt a sign saying so (He knows that if he goes in he will be laughed at). Both poems are similar also because they are based on black people being discriminated against by white.Both of these poems were very interesting and presented me with a question, which was how could I break down the barriers people have to make them better people? The poem I favoured was Nothings Changed because it was easier to picture as a story and I feel that the majority of people have mat up like an outsider at least once in their life. Half-Caste did bring a strong point across but I believe that it was brought across in a bizarre and confusing way whereas No things Changed was easier to relate to from a past event.