School Paper

University of Asia and the Pacific Pearl drive, Ortigas disarticulate Bill An argumentative subject Submitted as partial fulfillment For the operate requirements in English 102 Submitted to Ms. Judy Tanael 10/8/2012 Is separate re everyy necessity? According to the Compendium of the Catholic perform, the Sacrament of Marriage means that couples would wee a marital and exclusive impound betwixt them (Ratzinger, 2005). This bond bear never be broken unless the married couple is null or stated by an ecclesiastical authority that they be separated (Ratzinger, 2005).Coming from Gods Law, a marriage must non be destroyed beca practice session of the bond that is eternally established (Ratzinger, 2005). The Philippines, on the another(prenominal) hand, humpn for its being a religious rural argona, generally, believes in God. Thitherfore, it would be bizarre for Catholics to consume the promulgation this bill. Despite the religious nonion, disassociate has several effectua te on children, family and the society itself. Not nevertheless does fall apart create dispute in the family, it is possible that it be run to plagues that would be discussed further.The purpose of this root is for the lecturer to determine whether or not this bill must be implemented or not. This paper intends to defend the authors stand by providing reasonable arguments for the counter arguments. There be many another(prenominal) reasons why the Philippines should not have a decouple faithfulness. Although it would be impossible to state them all, this paper intends to discuss the major ones. According to the H. B. 1799, this bill proposes the nurtureion and fundamental equation of men and women (Ilagan & De Jesus, 2010).Proponents of the bill propose is a means to deal with municipal problems such as marital abuse, violence, and possibly mental incapacities (Ilagan & De Jesus, 2010). Does it veridically protect and safeguard e tonus for men and women in any way? Th is paper suggests that this bill does little to protect the future stinting tumesce-being of babelike partners, which tend to be female. split will not protect men, women or tear down the children for that matter. Is it really a result for marital involutions?It is true that divorce faeces be a medicine for these reasons simply think of it as a medicine that is not recommended. Why? If a couple repair to divorce because maybe of an abusive spouse, do you think that the abusive spouse wouldnt repeat what he did with his former spouse? And when he does, what do you suggest would happen? I think a divorce amends could come in handy. What I am trying to separate here is that, marriages and marital conflicts could be fixed. Abuse, violence and psychological incapacities argon problems that can soft be cured.How? By fearing God and teaching morality. If we fear God and know what morality really means, then none of these would have happened in the branch place. As what God said , Wives, submit to your husbands. Husbands, honey your wife as you love yourselves (Ephesians 522-33). This is where you gain happiness and fullness of marital life and your family. split up leads to long-term blackball effects on the family. It affects every member of the family nucleus, and when there be children involved they are the most affected of all.Children from divorced families are more than probable to suffer from psychological difficulties than those of inherent families (Portnoy, 2008). These problems include moreover are not limited to misconduct, poor academic performance, and earlier than chronic sexual natural process (Portnoy, 2008). In addition, divorce leads to long-term blackball effects on the family. It can lead to several problems that could affect not only the spouses that also, most especially, their children.Studies suggest that there are long-term effects on the childrens psychological ad notwithstandingment that could affect their future re lationships, symptoms such as anxiety, depression, conduct problems, academic performance, relationships, distress and subjective well-being can develop throughout time for children that are involved in divorce families (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, & Tambs, 2006). Studies show that children of divorce are inclined to experience psychological difficulties than children from intact or complete families, and those effects are probably to continue into maturity date (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, amp Tambs, 2006). Conduct problems are presumable to take place in this situation. Among the numerous reactions and effects of children in divorce families, conduct disorders, antisocial behaviors, and difficulty with authorities produce the largest notorious outcomes. According to a test, they are deuce or three times more likely to engage in adolescent delinquency than their friends from intact families, it was said that there is a higher(prenominal) incidence of conduct problems in boys than in girls (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, & Tambs, 2006).Adolescent children from a divorce family are also more likely to drink alcohol frequently and use prohibited drugs than children from a complete family (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, & Tambs, 2006). In conclusion, divorce of ones parents greatly wedges and disrupts the lives of these children. The psychological, emotional, and behavioral reactions results to eld of distress or disorder which is likely to extend into liberalhood, affecting even their romantic relationships.Although the majority of children of divorce resume substantially after some years, that recovery does not vanish those years of significant adjustment difficulty, nor is it complete enough to leave these people unharmed (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, & Tambs, 2006). On the other hand, offspring, especially adults, of divorced families tend to adopt a less positive reaction toward marriage and associate marital conflict with modern relationship with a negative p oint of insure (Portnoy, 2008).A study conducted by the Florida State University (2010), using a sample of two snow and eighty five adolescents, structural equation modeling reinforcered the opening that parental divorce and marital conflict were in drug-addictedly associated with early adult childrens romantic relationships through different mechanisms Parental divorce was associated with new-fashioned adults low take of relationship quality through a negative attitude toward marriage (positive attitude toward divorce) and lack of commitment to their own current relationships.However, marital conflict was associated with young adults low level of relationship quality through their conflict behavior with their partner (Cui & Fincham, 2010, p. 331). These effects can be long lasting, leading to other symptoms such as anxiety and depression. Divorce would unnecessarily subject children to this type of emotional distress. Furthermore, as children develop into adolescents and in the end adults, they tend to adopt social behaviors that they see in their parents.Hence, they are inclined to develop their attitude towards romantic relationships and marriage from their observations of that of their parents (Cui & Fincham, 2010). Cui and Fincham (2010) stated that there is an reverse correlation between parental divorce and attitude towards marriage, as well as commitment to relationships. This suggests the possibility that divorce can breed more divorce. Furthermore, there are certain effects of divorce on Womens wellness that could affect their psychological adjustment as well.Studies show that women develop psychological distress after experiencing divorce. In addition, women tend to experience high level of depressive symptoms which can lead to physical and mental health problems (Lorenz, Wickrama, Conger, Jr. , 2006). economically speaking, divorce has a detrimental effect on the spouse that was not gainfully employed and therefore was financially depen dent during the marriage (Ananat Michaels, 2007). In part, this is due to what is called economies of scale. Married couples share economic and social resources during their marriage (Waite, 1995).Since many of the cost incurred in maintaining a family household are fixed, the combined economic well-being of a married will be necessarily be better when compared to that of divorced individuals. This has far greater consequences for women than men given that women are more likely dependent on their husbands income during marriage. seek estimates that after divorce women experience a decline in income of between 23% and 73% (Beller Graham, 1985). The bill does provide some post-divorce support for the dependent spouse.This support is only required until the dependent spouse finds adequate employ, but it is not to exceed one year in period (Ilagan De Jesus, 2010). However, the ambiguity in the language of the bill when it refers to the employment requirement to be adequate, coupled with the time limitation on the spousal support makes this provision inadequate, as it fails to protect the post-divorce economic well-being of the dependent spouse. Divorce is a major societal concern, and society does not escape the lay waste to effects.The social effects of divorce are very well documented. query suggests that there is a positive correlation between divorce and crime (Wong, 2011). Wong (2011) argues that children from single-parent and divorced families have a higher predisposition towards wretched activity than those from intact families. Other studies suggest that adult males are less likely to commit crimes when they are married (Scafidi, 2008). There are several reasons that could be discussed on how family disruption, because of divorce, can be positively correlated to crime.Due to minimal supervising of parent/s and lack of parental guidance, their child could possibly be influenced or inclined to crime. Research suggests there is a positive correlatio n between divorce and crime. According to a British Crime look in 1982, it was measured that family disruption as a combined forefinger of marital separation, divorce, and single-parenthood, and they found that family disruption amplified the rates of robbery, stranger violence, burglary, auto-theft, and theft/ malicious mischief (Wong, 2011).digression from the stated reasons, there are also certain effects on social disorganization because of family disruption. According to Wongs (2011) social disorganization theory, the theoretic model here claims that meagerness, mobility, and heterogeneity increase the prospect of divorce, single-parenthood, and crime (Wong, 2011). guidance on low income and unemployed males may reduce the number of marriageable males and escalate the likelihood of family disruption (Wong, 2011).Concerning the influence of poverty on crime, poverty depletes the communitys resources, reduces its capacity to meet its members basic needs, and reduces its abil ity to monitor and control criminal activities, therefore eventually causing crime and delinquency to increase (Wong, 2011). Aside from the already mentioned social costs, divorce imposes an economic burden on society as well. The direct costs to the government include all divorce court related expenditures.This includes not only the cost of the judge, but also that of his staff and other employees, utilities costs, records costs, along with other expenditures (Schramm, 2006). When calculating these costs we must not only take into consideration the costs of the divorce proceeding itself, but also other related proceeding, such as those for alimony, child support, and child custody (Schramm, 2006). The higher crime rates associated with family atomisation increase the costs of the criminal justice system (Scafidi, 2008). This includes the costs to law enforcement, prosecution, the judiciary, and corrections.Scafidi (2008) found that approximately 24% of is caused by family fragment ation. The cost of investigating and prosecuting these crimes amounts to roughly ? 800 billion (Scafidi, 2008). Other costs include those associated with loss of productivity, foregone measure revenues, assistance to fragmented family who fall under the poverty line, and increased health expenditures to deal with psychological effects, just to name a few (Scafidi, 2008). In countries like the United States, to total costs associated with divorce and fragmented families exceeds $century billion every year (Scafidi, 2008).There is probably no completely true or even scientific approach for determining the economic impact to couples, comminutes, and even society as a whole. From what we can calculate, the empirical entropy suggest that the costs are substantial (Scafidi, 2008). These costs are real and someone must pay the price. Schramm (2006) suggests that these costs are absorbed by individuals, as well as communities, and governments. The Philippines is a mostly Christian peop le with a substantial Catholic community.As the religion of the majority of Filipinos, the point of view of the Church should not be overlooked. From the Catholic Bishop Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) to Pope benedick XVI himself, the Church has been very vocal and adamantly opposed to this bill. In a letter from His Holiness addressing the CBCP, the Pope instructed the bishops to continue their pursuit in defense of the sacredness of marriage and of the family (Aquino, 2011). Jo Imbong, legal counsel for the CBCP, even expressed the Churchs position claiming the legislation is unconstitutional (Alvarez, 2011).Article XV of the 1987 Constitution describes marriage as an inviolable social institution (Constitutional Commission, 1986). Those who oppose their position say that divorce is not only constitutional, but it promotes public policy as well (Gloria, 2007). Gloria (2007) suggest that the bill embodies the spirit of the constitution by promoting the holiness of the family , dignity of human life, the protection of the youth, and equality among men and women. On the other hand, divorce gives a wider path for immorality and infidelity. In my opinion, morality in the contemporary is fleeing.It is neither commonly discussed nor practiced anymore in this country except for religious sectors. I could cite several incidents regarding the immorality of Filipinos but it would be off topic. Nevertheless, The Philippines have a low moral abjection and this is the reason why these proponents with regard to divorce advocate unreasonable solution for certain problems. Didnt we learn from the United States? Did the statistics of violence against women drop when the divorce law was implemented? According to the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS) astir(predicate) 1. million women are physically abused and/or raped by their husband yearly (MINCAVA, 2010). On the worse part, in 2000, 1,247 women were killed by their husbands, go 440 men were killed by th eir wives (MINCAVA, 2010). More or less these domesticated incidents are inevitable, they are ought to happen because let us face it the absence of good keeps taking place. What I am coming to is that, physical abuse, rape and even murder happen annually regardless of the divorce law. Divorce is just another way for couples to resort because thats what the government wants they want us to depend on them.We are often too dependent that we swallow up somewhat problem solving and thinking critically. We talk much about the positive effects that we can get from the divorce law, whereas obviously the negative effects far outweigh the positive. References Alvarez, K. (2011, June 2). Divorce bill unconstitutional. Retrieved September 19, 2012, from fair weather Star Manila http//www. sunstar. com. ph/manila/local-news/2011/06/02/divorce-bill-unconstitutional-158847 Ananat, E. O. , & Michaels, G. (2007, April). The Effect of Marital dissolution on the Income Distribution.CEP Discussion Paper No 787. London Centre for economical Performance, London School of Economics. Aquino, L. G. (2011, July 9). Pope No to RH, divorce. Retrieved September 19, 2012, from The Manila bulletin http//www. mb. com. ph/node/326152/pope-no-rh-divorce Beller, A. H. , & Graham, J. W. (1985). Variations in the Economic Well-Being of Divorced Women and Their Children The single-valued function of Child Support Income. In M. David, & T. Smeeding, Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty, and Economic Well-Being (pp. 471-510). stops University of Chicago Press.Constitutional Commission. (1986, October 15). The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Quezon City Constitutional Commission of 1986. Cui, M. , & Fincham, F. D. (2010). The derivative effects of parental divorce and marital conflict on young adult romantic relationships. Journal of the International Association for Relationship Research(17), 331-343. Gloria, C. K. (2007). Who necessitate Divorce in the Philippines? Mindanao Law Journal, 18-28. Ilagan, L. C. , & De Jesus, E. A. (2010, July 27). House Bill No. 1799. An movement Introducing Divorce In The