Overpopulation, Industrialization, and the Degradation of the Environme

Over state, Industrialization, and the Degradation of the Environment The boilersuit harvest of the sympathetickind race in the last 2000 years has been a J-shaped growing. This can withal be expressed as an exponential growth. A big oppugn that can still be answered in clip is how this population growth will slow down or stop. The satellite can only handle so many a(prenominal) humans in the first place the effects of overpopulation institutionalise the purlieu into an unrecover open tailspin of degradation. So the forefront is will the boilersuit maximum human population be reached in a inactive manner with a course resulting in an S-shaped population growth, or do we as humans subscribe to to experience many kind of catastrophic event that will let us k this instant that the maximum message of our planet has been reached, or will we overpopulate little by little and realize that we need to reduce the population to a lower train? These three several(predicat e) theories have been termed the logistic, Malthusian, and domed theories of projected population growth, respectively(Southwick, 159-160). The trend that we have seen in recent history of human population growth can obviously not be sustained, so will the future tense of humans be played out in an optimistic or pessemistic light? Or will it be somewhere in in the midst of? Throughout human history, people have always been pressed to leave alone nourishment for themselves and their families. With the traverse of agriculture humans were provided with leisure time, and with that time they were able to develop many different trades beyond hunting, gathering, and agriculture. This meant that the food necessary to move over a population was able to be provided by a lowly portion of the population. With industrialization the portion of the population that was employed to feed the... ...r anthropogenetic greenhouse gases(Hansen). apparently the size of the human population has ef fected the surroundings by stressing the grease to produce enough food to feed us all. Up to now we have had a degrading effect on the environment. I touch that it should be our role as human beings to target care of the environment that we need to live. This is a necessary step in order to aspirate our survival on the planet Earth.Works CitedSouthwick, Charles H., Ch. 15 from Global ecology in Human Perspective Oxford Univ. Press, 1996, pp. 159-182Quay, Paul, CLIMATE change Enhanced Ups and Downs of carbon dioxide Uptake acquaintance 2002, vol. 298, pp. 2344-2346.Blunier, Thomas PALEOCLIMATEFrozen Methane Escapes from the sea Floor Science 2000, vol. 288, pp. 68-69. Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., Lo, K., Global Warming Continues Science 2002, vol. 295, p. 275 Overpopulation, Industrialization, and the Degradation of the EnvironmeOverpopulation, Industrialization, and the Degradation of the Environment The overall growth of the human population in the last 2000 years has been a J-shaped growth. This can also be expressed as an exponential growth. A big question that can only be answered in time is how this population growth will slow down or stop. The planet can only handle so many humans before the effects of overpopulation send the environment into an unrecoverable tailspin of degradation. So the question is will the overall maximum human population be reached in a gradual manner with a trend resulting in an S-shaped population growth, or do we as humans need to experience some kind of catastrophic event that will let us contend that the maximum capacity of our planet has been reached, or will we overpopulate gradually and realize that we need to reduce the population to a lower level? These three different theories have been termed the logistic, Malthusian, and domed theories of projected population growth, respectively(Southwick, 159-160). The trend that we have seen in recent history of human population growth can obviously not be sustained, so will the future of humans be played out in an optimistic or pessemistic light? Or will it be somewhere in between? Throughout human history, people have always been pressed to provide nourishment for themselves and their families. With the dawn of agriculture humans were provided with leisure time, and with that time they were able to develop many different trades beyond hunting, gathering, and agriculture. This meant that the food necessary to feed a population was able to be provided by a small portion of the population. With industrialization the portion of the population that was employed to feed the... ...r anthropogenic greenhouse gases(Hansen).Obviously the size of the human population has effected the environment by stressing the land to produce enough food to feed us all. Up to now we have had a degrading effect on the environment. I feel that it should be our role as human beings to take care of the environment that we need to live. This is a necessary s tep in order to prolong our survival on the planet Earth.Works CitedSouthwick, Charles H., Ch. 15 from Global Ecology in Human Perspective Oxford Univ. Press, 1996, pp. 159-182Quay, Paul, CLIMATE CHANGE Enhanced Ups and Downs of CO2 Uptake Science 2002, vol. 298, pp. 2344-2346.Blunier, Thomas PALEOCLIMATEFrozen Methane Escapes from the Sea Floor Science 2000, vol. 288, pp. 68-69. Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., Lo, K., Global Warming Continues Science 2002, vol. 295, p. 275